🔗 Share this article

Throughout the previous race for the White House, the former president courted the electorate with promises to lower costs starting on day one. However, after he assumed office, there was minimal focus to affordability issues. This shifted after price-fatigued voters delivered a rebuke at the polls. Within days, his team initiated a hastily assembled effort to tackle affordability. Unfortunately, this initiative has proven a hot mess—characterized by illogical claims, contradictions, magical thinking, scapegoating, and misleading statements.

Out-of-Touch Claims and Grocery Store Truth

Merely 48 hours post-election, the president kicked off his affordability drive with a disastrous statement: “Food prices are way down. All items is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” These words from billionaire Trump—often associates with fellow billionaires—revealed utter contempt for everyday citizens facing difficulties every time they go supermarkets. In effect, he dismissed their struggles as trivial, implying they were mistaken about actual costs.

His assertion about declining prices proved highly misleading and dishonest. In what way could all costs be decreasing when the taxes he imposed were increasing prices? Official statistics indicate banana prices increased 6.9% in the last twelve months, beef prices climbed almost 15%, and the cost of coffee surged 18.9%—partly because of import taxes on Brazil’s coffee and beef. In the first three quarters, costs increased in the majority of main grocery groups monitored by the Consumer Price Index, such as animal proteins (up 4.5%), drinks (increasing nearly 3%), and fruits and vegetables (rising slightly).

Inconsistencies and Inaccuracies in Financial Statements

Despite these numbers, the president persists in repeating his misleading narrative about affordability. Since election day, he has claimed there is “almost no price increases,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” These statements contradict the reality that prices overall have unarguably risen after the previous administration. At present, inflation is running at a 3% annual rate, which is 50% higher than the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal. Adding to the inaccuracies, he boasted that gas prices had fallen to nearly $2 a gallon, even though official data show they are over three dollars.

Confronted by reality and declining opinion polls, advisers evidently cautioned that his “costs are falling” message portrayed him as dangerously out of touch from ordinary people. Many voters are frustrated about prices continuing to climb after assurances of decreases. As a result, aides proposed one quick fix: roll back some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. This sensible idea clashed with Trump’s absurd assertion that new tariffs would not increase costs for US consumers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Possible Effects

With certain taxes reduced on several food items, the administration will likely claim that he has lowered costs once those foods begin to fall in price. This would be similar to a firestarter boasting for putting out a blaze that he had started. In another instance, when addressing McDonald’s executives, he declared that “we are in the peak period of America” and told listeners that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” These comments are easy for a wealthy individual to make, but seem insincere to millions of Americans facing hardships—particularly when millions risk losing food stamps or skyrocketing health premiums.

According to a survey from October, 74% of Americans think the state of the economy are mediocre or bad, while just a quarter consider them positive. Another poll showed that 61% of Americans feel the administration’s actions have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Financial Truth and Proposed Measures

Scott Bessent, Trump’s chief financial officer, lately contradicted claims of a prosperous era. He noted that far from booming, certain sectors of the US economy “have contracted.” Industrial production—a priority for the administration—seems to have shrunk for multiple consecutive months and shed around tens of thousands of positions this year. Pointing to these challenges, Bessent urged the central bank to cut interest rates—a move that could ease financial pressure.

In response to public dismay about living costs, Trump suggested a cash handout of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “high income people.” For many households in need, this sounds like manna from heaven, but the prospects are dim that lawmakers—concerned about large shortfalls—will enact such a plan. The scheme would likely increase federal spending, push up borrowing costs, and potentially fuel inflation by putting more money into consumers’ pockets.

Another supposed fix for cost issues centered on introducing half-century home loans, based on the idea that this would lower housing costs. However, the truth is that such lengthy loans would do little to reduce installments—often cutting them by just $100 or $200 each month. The downside is that these loans could more than double the total interest borrowers pay and hinder building home value.

Blaming the Past Government and Economic Prospects

In their affordability campaign, Trump and his team have once more blamed Biden for financial challenges, such as increasing costs. Spokespeople claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “addressing the prior administration’s price hikes.” These are absurd and inaccurate claims. Actually, Biden handed over a strong economy, with inflation way down, solid expansion, and unemployment low. However, Trump’s policies—especially import taxes—have resulted in an economic mess, pushing up prices and reducing economic output.

Per an economist, lead analyst at Moody’s Analytics, numerous regions are already in recession, with their conditions worsened by Trump’s tariffs. Zandi fears that if large states like California and New York enter a downturn, the US could slide into a widespread recession. In downturns, consumers typically have reduced funds to spend, and inflation usually declines. Unfortunately, with the highly-touted affordability campaign probably ineffective to hold down prices, his most effective “tool” for achieving increased affordability might end up triggering an economic contraction—a scenario that hard-pressed households cannot handle.